We can think through our disagreements. We can regard disagreements as hard deal breakers. OR we can regard them as opportunities to grow to encompass varied perspectives. It is the latter agonist position we take within Econet. The disagreements are not personalised in a way that leads to ad hominem attacks. Rather we remain civil and accept different perspectives from our own may have validity. This does not mean anything goes - arguments still need to be warranted and backed up by evidence, rhetoric etc. However it may be that we can hold a position of cognitive dissonance. That is we take the position that we do not know - and that further investigation is required.
Our Disagreements
One Man Band Should Econet be a one man band or not?